Tit-for-Tat
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8cfa2/8cfa259ac31734c37e8defaf66f12ae5295ee0e5" alt="Figure WN21.9 - When individuals meet each other many times, a tit-for-tat (TFT) strategy can be stable."
Figure WN21.9.
When individuals meet each other many times, a tit-for-tat (TFT) strategy can be stable. To give a concrete example, we use the payoff matrix of Fig. 21.33. If everyone plays TFT (blue), then they always cooperate and get a payoff of 3. An individual who always defects (red) will gain a payoff of 5 on the first encounter, but if he meets the same partner again, that partner retaliates, and the defector gains only 1. The diagram shows a series of encounters between pairs of players, with their average payoff per encounter. The common TFT strategy always does better than the invading defection strategy.
|