.
. CSHL Press .
. . . . .
.
 
.
.
. .
 

Request an Exam Copy of Evolution
 

.
. . .
.  BOOK COVER .
. . .
.
.  cover .
.
CLICK TO ENLARGE
 
Buy the Book
 
.
. Register at our site
www.cshlpress.com
to join our
Discount Program
and receive 10% discounts
on all website purchases.
.
.
 

CSH Protocols

 

You may also be interested in:

Evolution: The Molecular Landscape

Cold Spring Harbor’s 74th Symposium
EVOLUTION
The Molecular Landscape
Edited by Bruce Stillman,
David Stewart, and
Jan Witkowski,
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

   
 

Using FST to Detect Selection in the Periwinkle, Littorina saxatalis

The statistic FST measures the variance in allele frequency between populations relative to polymorphism within them and is expected to be the same across loci. This test has been used to locate selected regions of the genome in the periwinkle, Littorina saxatilis. Two distinct shell morphs have evolved (Fig. WN16.1A). The “H” form is found on the upper shore and has a wide, flat shell that can cling well to wave-lashed rocks. The “M” form is found on the lower shore and has a thicker, narrower shell that is better adapted to resist predation by crabs. Most genetic markers show rather little divergence both between populations of different morphs in the same place and between populations of the same morph in different places (FST ~ 0.025). However, about 5% of genetic markers showed substantial divergence between morphs in the same place, suggesting that they are closely linked to genes that are selected to maintain the adaptive differences between morphs (Fig. WN16.1B).

The same logic extends to morphological traits. If differences between populations are due to random drift, then the variance in trait mean between populations relative to the genetic variance within, measured by QST, should be the same for all traits and should equal the analogous ratio FST for other kinds of genetic variations. In fact, morphological traits vary substantially more between populations than do genetic markers such as allozymes or microsatellites (i.e., QST > FST; Fig. WN16.2). The most plausible explanation is that morphological traits experience stronger diversifying selection than do genetic markers. See Heller (1976), Hull et al. (1996), and Wilding et al. (2001).

 
 
 

 
. .